Yes, my friend Mike and I are headed off via a big fast airplane to Indianapolis, where we will experience the Star Wars extravaganza of a lifetime.
Star Wars Celebration III is what it is called, and I've been looking forward to it ever since Celebration II. I've been to all three Celebrations (the first being in Denver in 1999), and each has been an event to remember. This one looks to be the most incredible, however, as it is most likely the last one. Each Star Wars Celebration is held roughly a month before the opening of a new Star Wars film, and Episode III is the last Star Wars film, so.....
For those of you who don't know me, I am quite a huge Star Wars fan. I have loved every Star Wars movie that has come out, but of course love the original trilogy the best. I am wise enough to know, however, that the primary reason this is so is because I am now an adult, and am more analytical and jaded about theater experiences. Many folks do not realize this fact, and view the new trilogy as somehow a blasphemy of the old movies. This is sad, because if they could only jump into the mind of their youth, they would see that Star Wars has not lost its magic, they have.
That being said, there are some artistic decisions George Lucas has made that I very much disagree with. These decisions poke at me like a poking poky brain poker when I watch the films, but I refuse to let them spoil my enjoyment in the most swashbuckling of universes. It is with regard to these questionable choices that I offer you my spontaneous top ten list:
Top Ten Reasons I Would Like to Poke George Lucas with a Sharp Stick
# 10: Changing Anakin's ghost at the end of Return of the Jedi What an insult to Sebastian Shaw! Not to mention that it makes absolutely no sense. He's old. He dies. Hey, now his ghost loses 20 years off his face! Stupid.
#9: MidichloriansHey. Thanks for scientifically explaining the force. I'm sure everyone the audience was thinking, "You know, this movie makes perfect sense. Except for that force power. Can someone give me an equation or graph for that? That would be greeeeaaat."
#8: Anakin had no fatherI'm sure Jesus really appreciates this plot tidbit. There was really no need for it, except for conjuring up comparisons between the man who would be Darth Vader and our Holy Savior. Anakin's father could have come from many different places. How about Senator Palpatine as Anakin's father? Now there's a plot twist for you.
#7: "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine."
Uh, yeah. Sure. You are going to become a little blue ghost and follow Luke around giving ethereal advice. Vader knows this. Who are you trying to fool?
#6: Not including deleted scenes with the Original Trilogy DVDsOK...this isn't actually part of the movies, but it disturbs me so much I threw it in. There is no doubt in my mind, the only reason they were left out was to try to entice us fans to purchase the ENTIRE six movies in some uberexpensive megaset after they all are out on DVD. Great, because I really need a
fourth freakin version of all the films (and Lucas isn't
quite rich enough yet).
#5: Qui-Gon and Obi Wan's hair is completely dry shortly after entering Gungan CityThis is a small thing, but was brought to my attention by my lovely wife. Now it bugs me. Couldn't they have made a little more effort towards plot continuity? Throw em a towel, at least!
#4: Luke shows more concern for his shot up R2 unit than he does for his shot down boyhood friendThis takes place at the end of A New Hope. Biggs Darklighter, Luke's wingman that bites it on the trench run (gangly dude with porno black mustache), grew up with Luke on Tatooine and was supposedly his best friend. When he gets spaced by Darth Vader, though, all Luke could manage was a small downcast look of regret. Where's your fury, man?? Blow that friggin ball up for your pal!
#3: Wow, there's a lot of stinkin entries in a top ten list!Like, uh, at least eight or something.
#2: No, Greedo really shot first! Oh, didn't like that? Well, maybe they can shoot together? How's that?I'll admit, I'm like the 1 billionth person to complain about this change. But it is so infuriating, and really shows how George has changed over the years. There are two problems with this change: One, it is unrealistic that Greedo could miss from point blank range, and frankly insulting to the poor bounty hunter. I mean, come on. If a jawa could shoot R2 from point blank range..... Two, stop trying to save us from Han's smuggler side! He's a smuggler with a heart of gold, not a heart of gold with a heart of gold. If he were that, he wouldn't need credits. He'd be rich in love. For the world. And for everyone. Forever. *kiss*
And finally....number one sharp stick pokin reason:
#1: Freakin Jar Jar BinksOK, I'll admit again, I'm like the 10 billionth complainer about this worthless character. But I would like to respond to George's "explanation" for the schmuck, mainly that "This movie is for six year olds. If older fans have a problem with that, then that is too bad." (Not an exact quote, but close enough) Now anyone that knows me, and for those that don't but would like to refer to the above paragraphs, I am pretty darn good at getting into my inner six-year-old when I want to, and often do when watching these movies. My inner six-year-old has this to say to George Lucas: "Stop pandering to me. You had me at lightsabers." You see, the original trilogy appealed to the very young not because of slapstick stupid characters, but because of adventurous story line, guns, space battles, and occasional funny addins (i.e. belching sarlaac pit). These new movies HAVE all that! No need to add more. George, you had them at lightsabers.
I have now dumped on my beloved movies quite enough. There will be no more criticizing of the bestest movies ever on my blog. From me anyway. Unless I've forgotten something. Which I don't believe I have. Now I must stop typing, since I have wasted my whole evening. Good Night!